BNI™ 128.26s: Sugary chocolate bars & bonbons (average)

dietBNI™ 128.26s: Sugary chocolate bars, blocks and bonbons (average), AUS / NZ, 2011.

This is the nutritional value of sugary chocolate bars, chocolate blocks or chocolate bonbons, which share a similar nutritional profile different from the typical chocolate bar, block and bonbon. The profile represents the average aggregated nutritional value of a sample of 7 sugary chocolate bars, blocks and bonbons available in New Zealand and Australia in 2011, produced locally or internationally. The sample was collated as part of a research on the nutritional composition of chocolates in New Zealand. The sample was collated as part of a research on the nutritional composition of chocolates in New Zealand. This nutritional profile (see figure below) can be summarised as being: low in protein, adequate or high in carbohydrate, high in sugars, high in fat, high in saturated fat, low in fibre, and low in sodium.

This nutritional profile may be more representative of those who change brands often, as well as of the population, in general. However, it is less representative of the universe of brands on offer and of those consumers who prefer a particular brand of sugary chocolate, for which a prototypical nutritional profile may be more relevant (see foodBNI).


Nutrition information (100g)
Actual g Actual Kcal Actual % Ideal % Ideal Kcal Ideal g
Protein 3.9 15.6 3.4 20.0 92.9 23.2
Carbohydrate 69.5 278.0 59.8 55.0 255.5 63.9
Sugars 57.0 228.0 49.1 < 10.0 < 46.5 < 11.6
Fat 19.0 171.0 36.8 25.0 116.2 12.9
Saturated fat 12.1 108.9 23.4 < 10.0 < 46.5 < 5.2
Fibre 0.0 - 0.0 23.2 - 7.0
Sodium 0.103 - 5.1 < 23.2 - < 0.465
Misc 7.5 - - - - -7.5
Total 100.0 464.6 100.0 100.0 464.6 100.0
kJul - 1943.9 - - 1943.9 -
Nutritional balance (100g)
x (bad) Extremely low in protein
x (bad) Slightly high in carbohydrate
x (bad) Extremely high in sugars
x (bad) High in fat
x (bad) Extremely high in saturated fat
x (bad) Extremely low in fibre
(good) Extremely low in sodium
60% *
55% *
50% *
45% *
40% *
35% * *
30% * *
25% * *
20% * *
15% * *
10% * *
5%   * * *
mid p c f fb
max s sf na
5%   * * *
10% * *
15%    * *
20% * *
25%    * *
30% *
35%    *
40% *
45%    *
50% *
ideal % = grey cells; actual % = asterisk (*)

Reference

PEREZGONZALEZ Jose D (2011). Sweet chocolate. The Balanced Nutrition Index (ISSN 1177-8849), 2011, issue 2. (Retrievable from http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/BNI)


Disclaimer: Nutrition information is based on data provided on a product's nutrition information label or collected from a database (such as USDA). These data may only be averages, or may be incomplete. The BNI™ rating is based on an analysis of macronutrients and sodium and do not consider other nutrients that may be important. The BNI™ rating is also based on an average reference intake (Ideal values) which may vary from the recommended intakes for your country. Ideal values are for adults, and are based on a 2,000 kcal diet. Nutrition results are for research purposes, and should be considered editorial opinions given without warranty, and are not intended to replace the advice of a dietitian or health-care professional. BNI™, the Balanced Nutrition Index™, INE™ and el Índice de Nutrición Equilibrada™ are trademarks, and the associated formula and ratings are copyrighted material and may not be used for commercial purposes.


© Jose D. Pérezgonzález. All rights reserved.